Alternatives to FTMO

Compare similar program types and see exactly why each match is suggested. How our matching works

6 matches
Our take on FTMO
AI Summary
The firm appears to prioritize codified, risk-budgeted trading and enforces strict process discipline to enable scalable capital deployment. It is not for discretionary traders who rely on gut feel or high-variance bets, as risk controls and drawdown rules will throttle exposure or halt new trades. The one practice-critical rule is to observe the daily loss limit and position/sector exposure caps; breaching these triggers automatic risk controls and potential capital reallocation. Traders who benefit are those who run backtested, rule-based systems with clear risk budgets, while those who rely on intuition or news-driven bets will suffer from throttling and reduced deployment.
Min account
$2,500
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
90%
Fee
$39
Why this match?
FTMO ↔ AquaFunded
87% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
FTMO
Min account $10,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $89
Candidate
AquaFunded
Min account $2,500
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $39
Numbers similarity: 67%
Min account
-75.0%
Max allocation
0.0%
Profit split
0.0%
Fee
-56.2%
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$300,000
Profit split
80%
Fee
$98
Why this match?
FTMO ↔ FTUK
87% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
FTMO
Min account $10,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $89
Candidate
FTUK
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 80%
Fee $98
Numbers similarity: 76%
Min account
-50.0%
Max allocation
-25.0%
Profit split
-11.1%
Fee
10.1%
Min account
$625
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
90%
Fee
$25
Why this match?
FTMO ↔ Instant Funding
86% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
FTMO
Min account $10,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $89
Candidate
Instant Funding
Min account $625
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $25
Numbers similarity: 59%
Min account
-93.8%
Max allocation
0.0%
Profit split
0.0%
Fee
-71.9%
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
90%
Fee
$27
Why this match?
FTMO ↔ Blue Guardian
85% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
FTMO
Min account $10,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $89
Candidate
Blue Guardian
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $27
Numbers similarity: 70%
Min account
-50.0%
Max allocation
0.0%
Profit split
0.0%
Fee
-69.7%
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
100%
Fee
$44
Why this match?
FTMO ↔ Fintokei
82% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
FTMO
Min account $10,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $89
Candidate
Fintokei
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $44
Numbers similarity: 72%
Min account
-50.0%
Max allocation
0.0%
Profit split
11.1%
Fee
-50.6%
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$300,000
Profit split
100%
Fee
$35
Why this match?
FTMO ↔ OFP
82% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
FTMO
Min account $10,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $89
Candidate
OFP
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $35
Numbers similarity: 64%
Min account
-50.0%
Max allocation
-25.0%
Profit split
11.1%
Fee
-60.7%
About this page
How to use these alternatives
Quick guide, then the full methodology below.
1) Check the match
Open “Why this score?” to see overlapping rules and numeric deltas.
2) Compare programs
Use “Compare” to pick One-step/Two-step/Instant (or a 4-program 50:50 combo).
3) Verify details
Before choosing, confirm final rules on the firm detail pages.
Methodology
What we score and what we don’t.
FAQ
Common questions about scores and comparisons.
Why is the score not 100%?
Programs differ in rules and costs. The score summarizes overlap, not identity.
Why can one firm appear with multiple compare options?
Do affiliate links affect the ranking?