Alternatives to AquaFunded

Compare similar program types and see exactly why each match is suggested. How our matching works

6 matches
Our take on AquaFunded
AI Summary
Our take on AquaFunded is that its structure favors disciplined risk managers who can sustain a steady edge under a bounded capital framework. This is NOT for traders who require aggressive leverage, rapid scaling, or events-driven gambles, as the design punishes drawdowns and rewards consistency. One practice-critical rule is to enforce a hard daily drawdown limit and strictly cap net exposure across correlated instruments to avoid cluster risk. The firm benefits traders who are methodical, signal-driven, and patient about compounding; it tends to disadvantage those who rely on high-frequency turnover or big, speculative bets to hit short-term targets.
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
90%
Fee
$27
Why this match?
AquaFunded ↔ Blue Guardian
92% match ≈ 80% rules + 20% numbers
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
AquaFunded
Min account $2,500
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $39
Candidate
Blue Guardian
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $27
Rules overlap: 100% Numbers similarity: 80%
Min account
100.0%
Max allocation
0.0%
Profit split
0.0%
Fee
-30.8%
Min account
$2,000
Max allocation
$200,000
Profit split
80%
Fee
$13
Why this match?
AquaFunded ↔ Maven
79% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
AquaFunded
Min account $2,500
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $39
Candidate
Maven
Min account $2,000
Max allocation $200,000
Profit split 80%
Fee $13
Numbers similarity: 63%
Min account
-20.0%
Max allocation
-50.0%
Profit split
-11.1%
Fee
-66.7%
Min account
$625
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
90%
Fee
$25
Why this match?
AquaFunded ↔ Instant Funding
64% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
AquaFunded
Min account $2,500
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $39
Candidate
Instant Funding
Min account $625
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $25
Numbers similarity: 72%
Min account
-75.0%
Max allocation
0.0%
Profit split
0.0%
Fee
-35.9%
Min account
$1,250
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
80%
Fee
$25
Why this match?
AquaFunded ↔ Blueberry Funded
62% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
AquaFunded
Min account $2,500
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $39
Candidate
Blueberry Funded
Min account $1,250
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 80%
Fee $25
Numbers similarity: 76%
Min account
-50.0%
Max allocation
0.0%
Profit split
-11.1%
Fee
-35.9%
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$300,000
Profit split
100%
Fee
$35
Why this match?
AquaFunded ↔ OFP
61% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
AquaFunded
Min account $2,500
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $39
Candidate
OFP
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $35
Numbers similarity: 76%
Min account
100.0%
Max allocation
-25.0%
Profit split
11.1%
Fee
-10.3%
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
100%
Fee
$44
Why this match?
AquaFunded ↔ Fintokei
60% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
AquaFunded
Min account $2,500
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $39
Candidate
Fintokei
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $44
Numbers similarity: 82%
Min account
100.0%
Max allocation
0.0%
Profit split
11.1%
Fee
12.8%
About this page
How to use these alternatives
Quick guide, then the full methodology below.
1) Check the match
Open “Why this score?” to see overlapping rules and numeric deltas.
2) Compare programs
Use “Compare” to pick One-step/Two-step/Instant (or a 4-program 50:50 combo).
3) Verify details
Before choosing, confirm final rules on the firm detail pages.
Methodology
What we score and what we don’t.
FAQ
Common questions about scores and comparisons.
Why is the score not 100%?
Programs differ in rules and costs. The score summarizes overlap, not identity.
Why can one firm appear with multiple compare options?
Do affiliate links affect the ranking?