Alternatives to OFP

Compare similar program types and see exactly why each match is suggested. How our matching works

6 matches
Our take on OFP
AI Summary
Our take on OFP is that it serves traders who can operate within strict, rules-driven risk frameworks, but it is not for those who require maximal discretion to chase evolving narratives. The practice-critical rule is to adhere to fixed risk per trade and a firm daily loss cap—any breach triggers automatic trade suspension or capital shields. Automated, process-oriented traders who can codify entries and exits and tolerate some latency in execution will likely benefit from the structure; purely discretionary traders may see returns depressed by rigidity. Traders relying on ultra-high-speed micro-scalping or flexible position sizing may suffer from platform-imposed constraints and order-routing limitations.
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$300,000
Profit split
80%
Fee
$98
Why this match?
OFP ↔ FTUK
84% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
OFP
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $35
Candidate
FTUK
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 80%
Fee $98
Numbers similarity: 79%
Min account
0.0%
Max allocation
0.0%
Profit split
-20.0%
Fee
180.0%
Min account
$625
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
90%
Fee
$25
Why this match?
OFP ↔ Instant Funding
83% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
OFP
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $35
Candidate
Instant Funding
Min account $625
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $25
Numbers similarity: 62%
Min account
-87.5%
Max allocation
33.3%
Profit split
-10.0%
Fee
-28.6%
Min account
$2,500
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
90%
Fee
$39
Why this match?
OFP ↔ AquaFunded
82% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
OFP
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $35
Candidate
AquaFunded
Min account $2,500
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $39
Numbers similarity: 76%
Min account
-50.0%
Max allocation
33.3%
Profit split
-10.0%
Fee
11.4%
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
90%
Fee
$27
Why this match?
OFP ↔ Blue Guardian
82% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
OFP
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $35
Candidate
Blue Guardian
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $27
Numbers similarity: 86%
Min account
0.0%
Max allocation
33.3%
Profit split
-10.0%
Fee
-22.9%
Min account
$2,000
Max allocation
$200,000
Profit split
80%
Fee
$13
Why this match?
OFP ↔ Maven
79% match ≈ 80% rules + 20% numbers
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
OFP
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $35
Candidate
Maven
Min account $2,000
Max allocation $200,000
Profit split 80%
Fee $13
Rules overlap: 100% Numbers similarity: 56%
Min account
-60.0%
Max allocation
-33.3%
Profit split
-20.0%
Fee
-62.9%
Min account
$1,250
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
80%
Fee
$25
Why this match?
OFP ↔ Blueberry Funded
77% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
OFP
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $35
Candidate
Blueberry Funded
Min account $1,250
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 80%
Fee $25
Numbers similarity: 63%
Min account
-75.0%
Max allocation
33.3%
Profit split
-20.0%
Fee
-28.6%
About this page
How to use these alternatives
Quick guide, then the full methodology below.
1) Check the match
Open “Why this score?” to see overlapping rules and numeric deltas.
2) Compare programs
Use “Compare” to pick One-step/Two-step/Instant (or a 4-program 50:50 combo).
3) Verify details
Before choosing, confirm final rules on the firm detail pages.
Methodology
What we score and what we don’t.
FAQ
Common questions about scores and comparisons.
Why is the score not 100%?
Programs differ in rules and costs. The score summarizes overlap, not identity.
Why can one firm appear with multiple compare options?
Do affiliate links affect the ranking?