Alternatives to Lark Funding

Compare similar program types and see exactly why each match is suggested. How our matching works

6 matches
Our take on Lark Funding
AI Summary
Our take on Lark Funding is that it enforces a tight risk framework and a rule-based scaling path that prioritizes capital preservation over aggressive upside. Not for traders who require high leverage, loose drawdown tolerance, or rapid capital reallocation during drawdowns. A practice-critical rule is strict adherence to daily loss limits with automatic de-risking triggers; breaching this rule risks account freezing or funding suspension. The firm tends to benefit risk-averse, capital-efficient traders who execute small, precise trades. Aggressive scalpers or high-variance, high-turnover strategies are likely to suffer due to the capital-at-risk constraints and the forced de-risking cadence.
Min account
$2,500
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
90%
Fee
$39
Why this match?
Lark Funding ↔ AquaFunded
78% match ≈ 80% rules + 20% numbers
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
Lark Funding
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $200,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $105
Candidate
AquaFunded
Min account $2,500
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $39
Rules overlap: 33% Numbers similarity: 59%
Min account
-50.0%
Max allocation
100.0%
Profit split
0.0%
Fee
-62.9%
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
90%
Fee
$27
Why this match?
Lark Funding ↔ Blue Guardian
78% match ≈ 80% rules + 20% numbers
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
Lark Funding
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $200,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $105
Candidate
Blue Guardian
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $27
Rules overlap: 50% Numbers similarity: 69%
Min account
0.0%
Max allocation
100.0%
Profit split
0.0%
Fee
-74.3%
Min account
$2,000
Max allocation
$200,000
Profit split
80%
Fee
$13
Why this match?
Lark Funding ↔ Maven
74% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
Lark Funding
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $200,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $105
Candidate
Maven
Min account $2,000
Max allocation $200,000
Profit split 80%
Fee $13
Numbers similarity: 60%
Min account
-60.0%
Max allocation
0.0%
Profit split
-11.1%
Fee
-87.6%
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$300,000
Profit split
80%
Fee
$98
Why this match?
Lark Funding ↔ FTUK
55% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
Lark Funding
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $200,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $105
Candidate
FTUK
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 80%
Fee $98
Numbers similarity: 87%
Min account
0.0%
Max allocation
50.0%
Profit split
-11.1%
Fee
-6.7%
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$300,000
Profit split
100%
Fee
$35
Why this match?
Lark Funding ↔ OFP
53% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
Lark Funding
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $200,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $105
Candidate
OFP
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $300,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $35
Numbers similarity: 73%
Min account
0.0%
Max allocation
50.0%
Profit split
11.1%
Fee
-66.7%
FI
Fintokei
52% match
Min account
$5,000
Max allocation
$400,000
Profit split
100%
Fee
$44
Why this match?
Lark Funding ↔ Fintokei
52% match
Program comparison
Side-by-side numbers
Base firm
Lark Funding
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $200,000
Profit split 90%
Fee $105
Candidate
Fintokei
Min account $5,000
Max allocation $400,000
Profit split 100%
Fee $44
Numbers similarity: 70%
Min account
0.0%
Max allocation
100.0%
Profit split
11.1%
Fee
-58.1%
About this page
How to use these alternatives
Quick guide, then the full methodology below.
1) Check the match
Open “Why this score?” to see overlapping rules and numeric deltas.
2) Compare programs
Use “Compare” to pick One-step/Two-step/Instant (or a 4-program 50:50 combo).
3) Verify details
Before choosing, confirm final rules on the firm detail pages.
Methodology
What we score and what we don’t.
FAQ
Common questions about scores and comparisons.
Why is the score not 100%?
Programs differ in rules and costs. The score summarizes overlap, not identity.
Why can one firm appear with multiple compare options?
Do affiliate links affect the ranking?